In In the Matter of Anonymous, the Indiana Supreme Court, clearly demonstrated the need for attorneys to follow the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as the Indiana Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys. The court explained that an Illinois attorney who had applied pro hac vice was privately reprimanded after he failed for two years to file his Notice with the Clerk, nor pay his annual registration fee. The decision for the private reprimand seems to have been due to the parties' mutual agreement. So, the punishment for failing to follow the Rules could be a greater consequence.
« March 2006 | Main | June 2006 »
April 18, 2006
Recent Posts
- Court of Appeals Finds, Absent a Written Agreement by the Parties, Trial Courts have no Discretion to Grant a Jury Trial after the Time for Such Demand has Elapsed
- Court of Appeals Holds no Hearing Necessary Prior to Issuing Default Judgment as Sanction for Failing to Comply with Discovery Order
- Indiana Court of Appeals Finds Interest Allowable on Delinquent Marital Dissolution Payments
- Trial Courts may Consider Entirety of Pages Designated in Summary Judgment Proceedings
- Indiana Supreme Court Defends Modified Impact Rule
- No Private Right of Action for Medicaid Transportation Providers or Recipients
- Indiana Court of Appeals Holds Binding Arbitration Provision not Violative of Magnuson Moss or Indiana Lemon Law
- Indiana Court of Appeals Holds Enhanced Pension Not Marital Property
- Indiana Court of Appeals Denies Interest to Employee for Late Workers Compensation Payments
- Indiana Court of Appeals Absolves Good Faith Creditor.
Recent Comments