Trial Courts may Consider Entirety of Pages Designated in Summary Judgment Proceedings

In Flip v. Block, the Court held that when a party moving for Summary Judgment designates a page of a deposition (or other evidentiary means) but only uses a portion of that page in its Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment, the Court may, nevertheless, consider the entire page.  The trial court is not bound to considering only the specific sentences cited by the party in the Memorandum.  As such, Plaintiffs who failed to file a timely response or designation of materials to Defendants' Summary Judgment motion were permitted to ask the court to consider all pages designated by Defendants to prove the existence of a material issue of fact.